Darryl Block
Age: 45
Where they live: Sanford
Where they work: Senior Attorney at The Men’s Divorce Law Firm, practicing family law
Prior work experience: Darryl earned a bachelor’s degree in social work from the University of South Florida and a master’s degree in social work from Florida State University. While working in social services, including with veterans and people experiencing mental health crises, he went on to earn his law degree from Barry University and was admitted to the Florida Bar in 2012. As an attorney, he has represented employees whose rights were violated, and today he practices family law and serves as a Florida Supreme Court Certified Circuit Civil and Family Mediator, helping families navigate difficult situations and find solutions that work.
Prior political experience: Candidate for Florida House District 29 in 2018
Platform: “I am running to make life more affordable for working families, fully fund our public schools and support teachers, expand access to affordable healthcare, and protect local communities from decisions that put special interests ahead of the people who live there. I believe government should be accountable to people first, and elected officials should have the courage to fight for the communities they were elected to serve.”
Why they are running: “I’ve spent my career helping people through some of the hardest moments of their lives. I believe elected officials are supposed to fight for the people they represent — not political parties, corporations, or special interests. I’m tired of politicians showing up in our communities when they need our votes, then disappearing once the election is over. I’m running because people deserve a representative who shows up, listens, and fights for them every day — not just during election season.”
Endorsements: Florida NOW PAC; Greater Orlando NOW; Rainbow Democrats; Democratic Environmental Caucus of Florida; Seminole Education Association; Vote Ya’ll PAC; Engage Y’all PAC; Progressives for Democracy in America; Anna V. Eskamani; Carlos Guillermo Smith; Victor Torres; Carmen Torres; Jenn Webb; Jay Jurie; Amy Volpe; Ed Young; and David Bear, attorney and environmental advocate. Darryl has also received the 2026 Moms Demand Action Gun Sense Candidate distinction.
Candidate website: https://www.darrylblock.com/
Fun fact about the candidate: Darryl is an avid comic book collector and loves spending his free time at the Baseball field in Sanford watching the twins play.
Most recent campaign finance report: Darryl Block received $23,025.65 in contributions, including from individual donors, businesses and political action committees and spent $21,110.78. See his full campaign contributions and expenses below.
Darryl Block 2026 contributions to campaign
Darryl Block 2026 expenditures by campaign
Candidate Q&A: The questions below are based on voter questions and expressed priorities. Each of the candidates within a race were asked the same questions and given the same amount of time to respond. The candidates’ answers were fact checked but otherwise unedited.
Top problem and your suggested solution:
The cost of living is crushing families in this district, and Tallahassee has spent years looking the other way. I’ll push for upfront pricing and a real crackdown on the junk fees that pad every bill you get. I’ll modernize our price-gouging laws so you’re protected when prices spike, not just after a hurricane is declared, and back gas-tax relief when fuel prices jump because of things no family here caused. And I’ll go after the property-insurance companies that keep raising rates while their profits climb. Affordability isn’t a slogan for me. It’s the whole reason I’m running.
Problem 2 and your suggested solution:
Our public schools teach nearly three million kids, and the majority in Tallahassee treats them like an afterthought while shoveling billions into private-school vouchers with almost no accountability. I’ll vote to fully fund neighborhood public schools, raise teacher pay, and give teachers the job security to stay in the classroom instead of leaving the state. I’ll fight to shrink overcrowded classes and get schools back to basics: strong teachers, safe buildings, and kids ready for college, a career, or the trades. Public money belongs in public schools. Period.
Problem 3 and your suggested solution:
Too many families here skip care or drop coverage because they can’t afford it, and that’s a choice the state made. Florida still refuses to expand Medicaid and leaves federal dollars on the table year after year. I’ll vote to expand Medicaid, rein in the prior-authorization games insurers use to deny care, and force real transparency on prescription-drug pricing. I’ll also protect and expand mental-health services that too many families can’t reach when they need them. Healthcare should be about getting patients the care they need, not clearing a maze of barriers built to save insurers money.
Why do you deserve to be elected in this race?
I’m running because families here are paying more for groceries, gas, rent, and insurance while the people in charge spend their time on political theater. I’m not a career politician and I’m not looking to climb a ladder. I’ll show up, do the work, and put this district ahead of donors and special interests. You’ll always know where I stand, because I’ll tell you plainly and vote that way. If I don’t deliver, hold me to it.
According to a University of North Florida poll, Floridians say housing affordability is their top issue. What are your solutions for dealing with Florida’s affordability issue?
Insurance and taxes are pricing people out of homes they’ve lived in for decades, and seniors are getting hit hardest. I’ll push to hold the property-insurance market accountable, capping runaway rate hikes and taxing the excess profits insurers are sitting on. I’ll support building the kinds of homes working people can actually afford and protecting longtime homeowners from being taxed and priced out of their own neighborhoods. One bill won’t fix this, but I’m not interested in studying the problem for another four years. I’m interested in giving people relief they can feel.
Will you vote YES or NO on the constitutional amendment to slash property taxes, and explain your position. How would you replace lost revenue – fees and/or service reductions?
No. I’ll vote against it. Gutting local revenue with no plan to replace it doesn’t cut your costs, it just moves them, onto fees, onto renters, onto small businesses, and out of your schools, fire rescue, and law enforcement. I support real, targeted relief for the homeowners who need it most, especially seniors and working families choosing between food, medicine, and their mortgage.
Utility costs are rising for customers in Florida, and the proliferation of data centers is expected to exacerbate that issue. How should Florida’s utility regulators respond?
Families are already paying too much for power, and no one should see their bill go up so a data center can move in. We should require companies to disclose exactly how much energy and water a project will use, and make those big users pay for the plants and lines they need instead of pushing the cost onto your bill. Reliability, conservation, and environmental impact all get weighed before a single new cost is approved. I’m not against growth. I’m against families subsidizing it.
What do you think is the biggest environmental issue the government should address in your district?
Water. Clean drinking water and healthy springs, lakes, and rivers are the backbone of life and the economy in District 36, and reckless development is putting them at risk. As we grow, I’ll fight for smart decisions on stormwater, flooding, and the wetlands and natural areas that filter and store our water. We can protect our water and grow the economy at the same time, but only if the state stops treating clean water as optional.
Do you agree with the current federal and state governments’ approaches to immigration enforcement? Why or why not?
No, and I won’t pretend otherwise. What Florida is doing right now is cruel, expensive, and completely disregards the US Constitution. . Chasing down people with no criminal record, tearing families apart, and standing up detention operations that raise serious constitutional and humanitarian red flags doesn’t make anyone safer. It wastes your tax dollars and makes whole communities afraid to call the police. Real enforcement focuses on people who actually threaten public safety, respects due process, and doesn’t treat immigrant families like props in a political fight.
Do you believe abortion restrictions in Florida should be more strict, less strict or stay the same?
Less strict, without apology. The six-week ban is extreme and often hits before a woman even knows she’s pregnant. These are decisions for a woman, her family, and her doctor, not for politicians FULL STOP
In recent years, the Florida Legislature and the governor’s administration has acted more than 50 times to take away the ability of local governments to make decisions about everything from the use of plastic straws or gas-powered leaf blowers to the height and density of buildings when it comes to certain affordable housing developments. Explain why you support state preemption of cities and counties to govern themselves? Or, if you don’t support preemption, please explain why you don’t agree with the measures?
I oppose it. Tallahassee has overridden local communities more than fifty times on everything from leaf blowers to housing density, and most of it is about power, not good policy. The state should set a common standard only when an issue truly demands one statewide. Otherwise the people who live in cities like Sandford, Oviedo and Winter Springs should decide how they grow, not a legislator from the other side of the state. I’ll defend home rule and vote against preemption unless there’s a genuine, compelling reason the issue can’t be handled locally.
In the legislature, would you vote to protect local government’s efforts to establish rural boundaries to limit development in certain local areas?
Yes. I’ll vote to protect lawfully adopted rural boundaries and a community’s right to plan its own future. These boundaries limit sprawl, protect our water and wildlife, and keep development from outrunning the roads, schools, and drainage we already struggle to fund. Landowners still deserve clear rules and fair treatment, but the state shouldn’t be able to bulldoze a community’s long-term plan just to hand a developer a win.
Do you support expanding the eligible uses of the Tourist Development Tax under state law? If so, how would you allow local governments to use the TDT (i.e., for public infrastructure, transit, affordable housing, public safety)? If not, why not?
Yes. Local governments should have the flexibility, with public notice and real financial guardrails, to use a fair share of tourist tax dollars on the needs tourism itself creates: roads and transit, public safety, water and infrastructure, and workforce housing where there’s a clear tie to the tourism economy. Right now residents carry the cost of serving millions of visitors while that revenue stays locked into a narrow list of uses. That’s backwards. The people who live here shouldn’t foot the bill for the people passing through.
School districts across Florida are facing declining enrollment and the closures of public schools. What do you believe are the causes of the declining enrollment and how would you address those causes? Are there actions you would take to boost enrollment in public schools?
Enrollment is dropping because families are being priced out, because the voucher program is pulling kids and billions of dollars out of public schools, and because years of underfunding and political meddling have worn down trust. I’ll rebuild that trust by paying teachers what they’re worth, keeping classes smaller, expanding career and technical programs, and making school funding predictable instead of a yearly guessing game. And I’ll demand honest enrollment and financial data across every publicly funded option, so we plan responsibly instead of springing sudden school closures on families.
One of the causes of declining enrollment identified by some school districts is the diversion of dollars from public schools to private schools through the state’s multiple voucher or K-12 scholarship programs. Do you see the need for more accountability measures for education quality and/or financial stewardship at the private schools that now collectively receive more than $4 billion each year in public funds? If so, what accountability measures do you recommend?
Yes. Any school taking public money should meet public standards, full stop. That means independent financial audits, clear reporting on where the dollars go, conflict-of-interest rules, background and safety checks, real academic reporting, protections for students with disabilities, and actual consequences for fraud or chronic failure. More than four billion tax dollars a year flow into private schools with almost none of the accountability we demand of public ones. Public money without public accountability is just a blank check, and I won’t sign it.
Florida is currently fifth in the nation for measles cases because of declining vaccination rates among children. The Florida Surgeon General recently introduced a new rule that would allow parents to opt out eliminates vaccine mandates that aren’t required by law and allows parents to opt out of four vaccines (Hib, Hepatitis B, chickenpox and pneumococcus) for “moral and ethical reasons”; and opt out of the tracking database. Herd immunity requires 92-95 percent community vaccination rates to keep dangerous diseases under control. Where do you stand on maintaining vaccine mandates for public/private school entry? Do you believe that vaccines cause autism? Do you believe that the number of vaccinations a newborn/infant receives is a contributor to autism?
I support evidence-based vaccine requirements for school entry, with real medical exemptions. Broad opt-outs put infants and medically vulnerable kids at risk, and Florida is already fifth in the nation for measles because of it. Let me be clear: vaccines do not cause autism, and the number of shots an infant gets does not cause autism. Public-health policy should follow doctors and evidence, not political pressure or misinformation coming out of the Surgeon General’s office.
What specific actions will you take regarding the findings from the grand jury report on the Hope Florida controversy, and will you pursue the recovery of disputed funds?
I’ll push for a full, independent, transparent review of the grand jury’s findings and follow the money wherever it leads. If public or charitable funds were diverted, I’ll use every lawful tool to claw them back and hold the officials and private players involved accountable. And I’ll fight for the oversight and conflict-of-interest rules that should have existed in the first place, so a program meant to help vulnerable Floridians can never again be used as a political slush fund.
What will you do to protect voting rights and election integrity?
I’ll protect every eligible Floridian’s right to vote and make sure every lawful ballot counts. That means keeping vote-by-mail and early voting accessible, protecting secure drop-off and a clear ballot-curing process, funding our election supervisors, and shielding voters and election workers from intimidation. You don’t get election integrity by making it harder to vote. You get it through secure systems, consistent rules, professional staff, and telling people the truth about the results.
Readers shared concerns about overdevelopment in the Greater Oviedo and Winter Springs community. We know that local municipalities must allow for density based on state population projections. What can be done at the state level to balance property owners’ rights and the desires of your constituents?
Growth is coming. Bad planning doesn’t have to be. New development should never outpace the roads, schools, water, sewer, and drainage needed to support it, and the residents who already live here deserve a real say. At the state level I’ll fight to give local communities the flexibility to plan on accurate data, collect fair impact fees so developers pay their share, and bring residents to the table, instead of Tallahassee handing down one-size-fits-all mandates that ignore what’s happening on our streets.
Readers complained about roadway traffic in the community. What steps would you take to address this issue from the office that you’re seeking?
I’ll fight for transportation funding that matches how fast we’re growing and push for road improvements before major development goes in, not years after the gridlock arrives. I’ll work with local governments, the regional transit authority, and FDOT to prioritize the projects that actually move traffic and keep people safe. And I’ll back fair developer impact fees, better signal timing, safer routes for people on foot and on bikes, and transit where it genuinely cuts congestion. Developers shouldn’t get to build first and leave you sitting in traffic later.
How do you balance the idea of home rule when state lawmakers preempt decisions from local governments?
I defend home rule, plainly. The people of Oviedo, Winter Springs, Geneva, and every community here should have a real voice in what happens to their neighborhoods, schools, and growth. Statewide standards have their place, but preemption should be rare and backed by a clear statewide need. The state shouldn’t use its power to silence local voters or override local planning just because it can.
Do you support the rural boundary in Seminole County? How do you balance that with private landowners’ rights to build?
Yes. I support keeping Seminole County’s Rural Boundary because it protects our natural resources, holds back sprawl, and preserves the character of places like Geneva. I also respect property owners and believe they deserve clear rules and fair treatment. We can direct heavier growth to the right places and use tools like conservation easements or transferable development rights without tearing the boundary apart. Protecting the boundary and treating landowners fairly aren’t in conflict.
What are you, as a candidate, willing to do to restore respect for the election process?
I’ll tell the truth about election results, even when I lose, and I’ll reject the intimidation and conspiracy theories that have poisoned our politics. I’ll back transparent audits, paper records, public observation under clear rules, and steady voter education. Candidates have a duty to accept verified outcomes and use lawful processes for real disputes, not tear down people’s confidence just because they didn’t like the count. Respect for elections starts with candidates having the guts to be honest.